Central American Indian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Select to Compare
Female Unemployment
Central American Indian Female Unemployment
6.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT | FEMALES
74.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 290,946,551 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 6.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.13% in unemploymnet rate among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Central American Indians and unemploymnet rate among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Central American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemploymnet rate among females within an area, or if Central American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemploymnet rate among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.5%, a difference of 0.29%), British West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Spanish American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 75.5 /100 | #308 | Good 6.4% |
| Shoshone | 75.3 /100 | #309 | Good 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 75.3 /100 | #310 | Good 6.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 75.2 /100 | #311 | Good 6.4% |
| British West Indians | 74.9 /100 | #312 | Good 6.4% |
| Immigrants from Mexico | 74.7 /100 | #313 | Good 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 74.5 /100 | #314 | Good 6.5% |
| Central American Indians | 74.5 /100 | #315 | Good 6.5% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 73.7 /100 | #316 | Good 6.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 73.6 /100 | #317 | Good 6.6% |
| Immigrants from Belize | 73.5 /100 | #318 | Good 6.6% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 73.4 /100 | #319 | Good 6.6% |
| Houma | 73.1 /100 | #320 | Good 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 72.8 /100 | #321 | Good 6.6% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 72.4 /100 | #322 | Good 6.7% |
Central American Indian Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American Indian Data | Female Unemployment Data |
| Minimum | 0.075% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 24.6% |
| Range | 30.5% | 23.7% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 9.1% |
| Median | 4.4% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Central American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Unemployment |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 204,682,963 | 5.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 54,419,746 | 6.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 14,850,740 | 6.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 7,146,599 | 7.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 3,502,892 | 6.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,930,863 | 6.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 1,299,397 | 6.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 644,362 | 6.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 671,586 | 7.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 410,010 | 7.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 214,688 | 7.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.15% | 224,174 | 7.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 251,344 | 5.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.56% | 153,378 | 6.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 45,131 | 12.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 117,925 | 8.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 13,641 | 13.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 32,783 | 4.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 33,345 | 18.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.69% | 11,365 | 4.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 5,010 | 7.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 11,774 | 5.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 6,526 | 1.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 3,078 | 5.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 11,800 | 18.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 3,841 | 4.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 437 | 16.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 6,633 | 12.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 47,281 | 13.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 639 | 0.90% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 6,936 | 4.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 18,948 | 11.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.04% | 42,174 | 14.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 5,692 | 14.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.57% | 6,847 | 6.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 2,250 | 8.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 1,426 | 12.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.15% | 3,585 | 5.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 10,011 | 15.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.57% | 2,982 | 24.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.71% | 2,896 | 9.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.56% | 5,042 | 14.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18% | 2,841 | 17.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.64% | 26,153 | 7.9% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.05% | 37,895 | 6.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16% | 1,697 | 9.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.57% | 15,225 | 6.3% |