Chinese GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
GED/Equivalency
Chinese GED/Equivalency
89.0%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 89.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.39% in percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Carpatho Rusyn (89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Norwegian (89.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Eastern European (89.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Bulgarian (89.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Thai (89.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 89.5% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 89.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 89.2% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 89.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 89.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 89.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 89.1% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 89.0% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 89.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 89.0% |
| Lithuanians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 88.9% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 88.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 88.9% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 88.9% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 88.8% |
Chinese GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | GED/Equivalency Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 75.4% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 8.3% | 24.6% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 89.6% |
| Median | 1.2% | 89.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.60% | 86.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 93.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | GED/Equivalency |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 84.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 87.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 89.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 88.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 87.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 91.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 88.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 86.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 88.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 89.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 84.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 83.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 87.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 91.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 89.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 91.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 87.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 81.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 89.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 93.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 89.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 86.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 758 | 100.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 95.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 87.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 90.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 96.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 89.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 94.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 94.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 91.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 93.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 92.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 93.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 92.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 92.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 97.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 92.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 92.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 86.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 98.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 85.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 93.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 83.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 88.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 80.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 87.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 95.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 85.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 96.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 79.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 98.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 85.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 92.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 86.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 90.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 93.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 75.4% |