Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
8.3%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 8.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Tlingit-Haida (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Chinese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
Minimum | 0.0087% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 6.7% | 20.4% |
Range | 6.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 1.5% | 8.4% |
Median | 1.1% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.54% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 4.1% |
Correlation Details
Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,037,641 | 13.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,049,043 | 8.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 7.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,117,453 | 8.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 8.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 235,528 | 8.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 8.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 9.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 168,423 | 8.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 8.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 11.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 73,399 | 12.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 7.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 5.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 102,015 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 9.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 7.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 4.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 50,280 | 8.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 11.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 2.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 4.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 4.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 1.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 25,957 | 13.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 5.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 49,512 | 6.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 1.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 5.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 5.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 5.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 5.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 2.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 20.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 17.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 12.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 6.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 8.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 10.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 17.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 13.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 2.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 13.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 1.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 9.6% |