Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 77.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.0% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Malaysian (77.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (77.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (77.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
French | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Immigrants from Laos | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Data |
Minimum | 0.0087% | 57.5% |
Maximum | 8.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 8.3% | 42.5% |
Mean | 1.6% | 79.9% |
Median | 1.1% | 79.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.56% | 75.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 83.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 8.4% |
Correlation Details
Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 73.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 77.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 75.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 75.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 77.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 83.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 81.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 79.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 81.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 76.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 70.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 80.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 81.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 82.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 82.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 76.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 77.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 83.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 80.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 72.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 758 | 57.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 72.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 85.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 85.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 82.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 83.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 83.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 71.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 82.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 77.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 76.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 70.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 81.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 82.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 78.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 77.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 61.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 76.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 73.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 96.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 70.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 84.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 95.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 72.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 79.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 73.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 79.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 93.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 71.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 87.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 100.0% |