Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16
64.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,883 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.573 and weighted average of 64.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.9% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are British (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Northern European (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Belize | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 8.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Croatians | 8.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Europeans | 8.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Poles | 8.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Northern Europeans | 8.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 64.7% |
| British | 7.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Chinese | 7.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 7.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 64.7% |
| Africans | 5.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Slavs | 4.9 /100 | #233 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Vietnamese | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Austrians | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 4.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 64.6% |
| Italians | 4.6 /100 | #237 | Tragic 64.6% |
Chinese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 38.6% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 72.9% |
| Range | 8.3% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 62.4% |
| Median | 1.2% | 63.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.60% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 65.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 5.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 64.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 65.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 66.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 65.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 62.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 65.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 64.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 65.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 64.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 61.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 59.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 67.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 62.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 62.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 60.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 65.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 68.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 63.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 58.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 758 | 55.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 65.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 63.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 68.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 66.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 72.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 68.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 60.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 66.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 69.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 64.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 65.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 62.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 65.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 63.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 61.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 62.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 63.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 55.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 51.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 61.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 65.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 51.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 60.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 58.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 60.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 62.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 60.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 66.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 52.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 56.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 59.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 62.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 61.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 66.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 54.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 38.6% |