Chinese Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Chinese Single Mother Poverty
24.6%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,411,570 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.265 and weighted average of 24.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.8% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (24.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (24.4%, a difference of 1.0%), Filipino (24.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Iran (25.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (25.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 23.8% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 23.9% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 24.3% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 24.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 24.5% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 24.6% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 25.1% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 25.2% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 25.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 25.6% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Chinese Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 4.6% | 63.6% |
| Range | 4.6% | 61.1% |
| Mean | 1.3% | 24.6% |
| Median | 1.1% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.54% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 31.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 11.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,044,561 | 31.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.060% | 4,987,052 | 25.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,507,466 | 24.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,036,944 | 26.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 26.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 241,237 | 27.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 29.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 206,332 | 24.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 171,661 | 15.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 86,068 | 40.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 22.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 64,704 | 45.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 115,518 | 34.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 73,347 | 37.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 247,719 | 23.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 95,546 | 31.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 112,706 | 18.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 80,366 | 35.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 28.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 14,918 | 26.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 25.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 66,721 | 29.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 29.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 52,024 | 23.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,105 | 34.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 38,517 | 37.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 14.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 9.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 11.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 25,957 | 28.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 49,512 | 29.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 12.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 38,674 | 9.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 9.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 5.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 18.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 20.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 36.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 17.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 15.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 15.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 63.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 36.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 44.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 4,786 | 22.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 17.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 33.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 12.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 2.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 15.4% |