Immigrants from Japan GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Select to Compare
GED/Equivalency
Immigrants from Japan GED/Equivalency
88.4%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,148,851 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 88.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Japan influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education within an area, or if Immigrants from Japan simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Sweden (88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (88.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (88.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bhutanese (88.4%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 88.6% |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 88.5% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 88.5% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 88.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 88.4% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 88.4% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 88.4% |
Immigrants from Japan | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 88.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 88.4% |
Immigrants from Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 88.3% |
Immigrants from Austria | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 88.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 88.3% |
Immigrants from Israel | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 88.2% |
Italians | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 88.2% |
Finns | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 88.2% |
Immigrants from Japan GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan Data | GED/Equivalency Data |
Minimum | 0.077% | 62.7% |
Maximum | 52.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.7% | 37.3% |
Mean | 9.2% | 90.1% |
Median | 5.2% | 92.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 87.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 94.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Japan Percentile | Sample Size | GED/Equivalency |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.077% | 253,949,803 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 53,811,779 | 86.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 16,893,306 | 89.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 5,439,378 | 92.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 3,165,911 | 92.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 1,529,860 | 92.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 1,783,877 | 92.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 825,086 | 94.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 473,447 | 91.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 260,987 | 93.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 193,633 | 93.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 96,647 | 93.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 77,043 | 96.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 179,939 | 88.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 72,977 | 93.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 709,893 | 90.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 168,533 | 92.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 30,305 | 96.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.92% | 34,879 | 96.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 76,230 | 94.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 4,333 | 93.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 30,697 | 87.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 202,903 | 93.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.01% | 37,151 | 95.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 13,751 | 95.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 767 | 93.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 703 | 88.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 543 | 86.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.09% | 460 | 88.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 481 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.66% | 7,280 | 98.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.02% | 413 | 74.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 42,828 | 92.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.62% | 348 | 72.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.00% | 100 | 80.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 1,018 | 88.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.84% | 61 | 71.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.98% | 27,373 | 93.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 73 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 696 | 97.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 327 | 62.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.27% | 1,690 | 78.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.53% | 368 | 85.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.63% | 332 | 83.4% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.23% | 222 | 85.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.70% | 183 | 100.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.01% | 93 | 100.0% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.78% | 144 | 92.3% |