Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64
10.3%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 10.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.74% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Italy (10.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (10.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Uruguay | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Palestinians | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 98.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chinese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
Minimum | 0.0087% | 4.2% |
Maximum | 8.3% | 33.9% |
Range | 8.3% | 29.7% |
Mean | 1.7% | 12.1% |
Median | 1.2% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.58% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 12.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 11.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,049,043 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 9.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 11.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 13.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 11.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 12.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 15.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 13.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 6.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 9.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 10.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 5.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 14.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 10.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 5.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 5.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 7.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 9.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 7.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 7.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 9.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 9.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 4.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 7.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 6.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 22.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 33.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 11.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 30.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 16.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 10.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 8.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 11.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 29.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 31.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 9.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 7.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 16.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 4.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 6.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 24.5% |