Arab GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
GED/Equivalency
Arab GED/Equivalency
86.6%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
86.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,870,847 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 86.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Chilean (86.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (86.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (86.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (86.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (86.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
| Immigrants from Germany | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 88.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 88.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Tsimshian | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Albanians | 87.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Immigrants from Asia | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Chileans | 86.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Arabs | 86.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 85.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 86.5% |
| Paraguayans | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 86.5% |
| Laotians | 83.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 86.5% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 82.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 86.4% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 82.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 86.4% |
| Bolivians | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 86.4% |
Arab GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab Data | GED/Equivalency Data |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 55.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.8% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 85.0% |
| Median | 13.3% | 86.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 82.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 90.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.4% | 9.9% |
Correlation Details
| Arab Percentile | Sample Size | GED/Equivalency |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 197,411,126 | 83.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 128,266,187 | 86.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 74,009,936 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 39,533,559 | 86.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,949,580 | 88.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 11,190,613 | 90.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,888,008 | 87.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,308,490 | 89.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 2,103,282 | 89.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,142,218 | 87.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 940,941 | 90.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 840,728 | 90.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 681,743 | 87.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 442,981 | 88.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 219,868 | 82.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 415,222 | 89.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 283,117 | 90.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 141,035 | 86.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 282,500 | 84.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 199,092 | 85.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 84,443 | 90.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 323,125 | 86.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 30,824 | 55.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 86,980 | 87.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.17% | 53,472 | 91.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 98,207 | 86.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 127,955 | 82.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 145,544 | 80.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 47,371 | 84.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.14% | 51,471 | 86.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,414 | 80.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 122 | 75.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.53% | 38,222 | 91.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,809 | 82.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.46% | 332 | 86.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 156 | 69.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.87% | 2,042 | 96.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 91.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 58.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,511 | 61.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 79.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.09% | 94 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.38% | 952 | 93.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.52% | 54 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.02% | 8,551 | 90.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.38% | 211 | 87.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 51 | 100.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 70.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 65.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 78.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.93% | 598 | 85.8% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,894 | 67.7% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 91.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,492 | 83.8% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 68.0% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 91.6% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 82.3% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 85.7% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.01% | 117 | 95.5% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 72.0% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.91% | 660 | 100.0% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 73.9% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.24% | 107 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 69 | 100.0% |