Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,807,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 85.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.46% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Turkish (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Taiwanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Turks | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Chinese | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slovaks | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Serbians | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Albanians | 99.4 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 99.3 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Uganda | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Swedes | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 64.7% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 8.3% | 35.3% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 85.0% |
| Median | 1.2% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.58% | 83.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 88.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 5.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 84.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 83.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 83.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 84.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 86.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 84.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 84.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 83.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 82.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 81.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 84.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 83.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 85.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 83.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 84.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 89.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 84.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 87.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 89.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 84.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 84.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 83.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 90.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 87.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 90.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 84.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 89.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 85.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 90.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 91.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 83.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 83.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 86.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 74.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 85.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 72.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 86.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 80.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 86.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 91.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 90.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 90.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 85.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 74.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 68.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 85.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 90.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 91.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 90.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 64.7% |