Yugoslavian GED/Equivalency
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Select to Compare
GED/Equivalency
Yugoslavian GED/Equivalency
86.7%
GED/EQUIVALENCY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian GED/Equivalency Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,719,638 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252 and weighted average of 86.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.24% in percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yugoslavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education within an area, or if Yugoslavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with at least ged/equivalency education due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by GED/Equivalency
In terms of ged/equivalency, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Argentinean (86.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (86.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (86.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (86.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Egypt (86.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | GED/Equivalency |
| Immigrants from Lebanon | 90.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 86.8% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 90.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 86.8% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 90.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 90.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 86.7% |
| Celtics | 90.4 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 86.7% |
| Asians | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 86.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Yugoslavians | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 88.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 88.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 86.7% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 88.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Tsimshian | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Albanians | 87.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 86.6% |
| Immigrants from Asia | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 86.6% |
Yugoslavian GED/Equivalency Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian Data | GED/Equivalency Data |
| Minimum | 0.060% | 69.6% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.4% | 30.4% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 86.8% |
| Median | 5.9% | 87.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 85.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 89.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
| Yugoslavian Percentile | Sample Size | GED/Equivalency |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.060% | 239,064,011 | 85.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 27,882,667 | 88.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 8,635,864 | 88.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 3,570,912 | 86.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 2,193,517 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,093,510 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 753,790 | 85.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 391,529 | 87.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 389,870 | 87.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 374,706 | 87.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 269,257 | 87.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 195,748 | 87.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 116,196 | 87.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 164,492 | 88.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 44,297 | 90.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 28,373 | 85.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 51,411 | 93.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 85,120 | 82.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 5,070 | 88.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 8,180 | 87.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 11,563 | 91.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 32,592 | 95.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 12,554 | 89.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 6,609 | 88.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 10,984 | 91.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 71,284 | 88.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 22,286 | 88.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 1,508 | 86.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 72 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 950 | 88.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 64,994 | 75.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 835 | 95.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 19,969 | 90.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 1,022 | 93.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 16,211 | 82.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 4,947 | 88.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.43% | 4,873 | 86.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.53% | 332 | 88.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 29,089 | 88.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 36,359 | 84.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 622 | 88.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 40,152 | 73.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.93% | 56 | 88.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.39% | 2,280 | 92.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52% | 105 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 51 | 84.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.40% | 846 | 85.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.55% | 502 | 89.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.80% | 881 | 75.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.61% | 238 | 69.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.51% | 74 | 100.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.87% | 137 | 76.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.48% | 3,812 | 90.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.44% | 136 | 69.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 105 | 71.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.59% | 102 | 98.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.29% | 73 | 82.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.35% | 1,875 | 79.5% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.47% | 38 | 84.2% |