Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
Poverty
Chinese Poverty
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.52% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants from Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chinese Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 26.1% |
| Range | 8.3% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 10.2% |
| Median | 1.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.60% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 14.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,049,043 | 10.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 8.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 9.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 10.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 9.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 11.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 9.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,813 | 10.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 9.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 11.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 20.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 11.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 7.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 8.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 6.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 9.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 7.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 4.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 14.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 10.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 3.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 5.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 5.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 3.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 27,739 | 8.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 6.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 50,142 | 11.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 3.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 5.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 4.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 5.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 7.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 5.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 17.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 465 | 21.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 14.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 6.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 20.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 22.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,576 | 17.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 4.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 4.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 5.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 279 | 16.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 25.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 686 | 9.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 9.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 3.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 548 | 8.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 6.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 5.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 26.1% |