Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Chinese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.7% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chinese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 within an area, or if Chinese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Immigrants from Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants from Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese Data | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Data |
| Minimum | 0.0087% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 75.9% |
| Range | 8.3% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 40.5% |
| Median | 1.1% | 39.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.56% | 35.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 42.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 10.4% |
Correlation Details
| Chinese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0087% | 53,055,746 | 33.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 5,055,740 | 39.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 1,538,210 | 36.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 1,149,266 | 41.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 529,051 | 42.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 242,519 | 43.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 241,739 | 36.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 264,410 | 36.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35% | 172,252 | 36.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 107,016 | 35.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 144,779 | 42.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 76,395 | 41.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 117,219 | 33.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 79,978 | 32.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 263,904 | 36.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 104,383 | 47.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 114,487 | 43.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 82,656 | 38.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 454,777 | 39.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 24,095 | 54.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 151,355 | 32.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 78,354 | 42.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 758 | 53.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 40,323 | 27.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 54,182 | 35.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 13,292 | 41.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 39,437 | 38.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 22,864 | 37.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 30,508 | 42.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 77,415 | 36.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 54,362 | 37.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 25,957 | 32.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 11,138 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.44% | 49,512 | 39.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 27,423 | 39.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 45,392 | 33.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 48,494 | 36.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 18,802 | 40.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 35,493 | 48.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 41,560 | 46.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 10,801 | 41.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 8,543 | 49.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 63,439 | 44.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,555 | 75.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 1,507 | 35.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 1,094 | 62.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 159 | 25.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 8,571 | 31.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 130 | 25.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 3,627 | 41.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 4,135 | 66.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 9,571 | 41.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 5,065 | 42.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.68% | 853 | 31.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.28% | 157 | 66.7% |