Italian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Italian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Italians
Chippewa
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,969,430 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 37.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Italian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 98.0% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 38.7% |
| Median | 17.3% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Italians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Romanian (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |