Immigrants from Micronesia vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
White/Caucasian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Whites/Caucasians
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs White/Caucasian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,571,730 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,250,050 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 5.7% |
| Range | 7.3% | 3.6% |
| Mean | 4.2% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.77% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Whites/Caucasians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (3.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |