Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,643,108 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.536. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 67.0 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $50,077, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $87,580, a difference of 24.8%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $39,935, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $51,387, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $38,614, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 94.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.6%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 58.2%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 49.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and family households (64.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.0%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.1%).