Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Colville Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,871,340 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 53.5 Colville.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,051 compared to $70,094, a difference of 32.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $82,474, a difference of 32.6%), and median family income ($112,527 compared to $85,792, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $49,774, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $37,514, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $51,739, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 69.8%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 68.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 69.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.5%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 105.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 48.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.66%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.0%), bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 46.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 176.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 79.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.9%).