Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,830,487 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 22.6 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,527 compared to $70,423, a difference of 59.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $65,996, a difference of 58.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $69,234, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $31,560, a difference of 37.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $39,726, a difference of 39.9%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 159.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 151.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 139.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 63.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 63.5%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 79.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 77.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 73.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 65.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 56.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.30%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.28, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.1%), no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.6%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 91.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 14.1%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.9%).