Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Polish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,399,688 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.497% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 497.0 Poles.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $40,371, a difference of 7.3%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $46,123, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $61,598, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $105,952, a difference of 3.2%), and median family income ($112,527 compared to $108,507, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.040%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.43%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 61.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Polish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.43%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.2%).