Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Syrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,428,874 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Syrians within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Syrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 22.1 Syrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $51,353, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($43,309 compared to $40,727, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($51,624 compared to $48,934, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $63,494, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $107,207, a difference of 2.0%), and median family income ($112,527 compared to $109,299, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.55%), and family households (64.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 39.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.7%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Syrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%).