Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,782,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 103.3 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $49,463, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $55,522, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $104,713, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $64,462, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $110,633, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and male poverty (10.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.11%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.59%).