Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,176,277 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 47.6 Immigrants from Philippines.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $57,930, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $102,910, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,114, a difference of 0.33%), median family income ($107,715 compared to $108,288, a difference of 0.53%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $48,266, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.47%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%), family households (65.0% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 27.1%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).