Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,880,255 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.761. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.498% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 498.4 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 11.0%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $46,430, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $102,015, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $42,229, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($51,555 compared to $49,368, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $54,593, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.6%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.55%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.2%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.7%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%).