Immigrants from France vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,515,972 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 77.1 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $40,244, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $92,872, a difference of 29.3%), and median household income ($96,743 compared to $76,387, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $48,977, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $36,920, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 33.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.6%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), family households (61.3% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.4%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 80.9%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.1%).