Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women
36.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,635,203 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 36.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.62% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Mexican (36.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Cree (37.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Barbados (36.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Barbadian (37.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Congo (36.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Immigrants from Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 36.7% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 36.8% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 36.9% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 37.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 37.1% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 37.1% |
| West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 37.3% |
Choctaw Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.079% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 96.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.5% | 90.9% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 53.2% |
| Median | 15.4% | 46.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 36.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 63.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 26.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 22.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 22.2% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.079% | 247,067,916 | 33.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 5,518,872 | 39.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,715,314 | 34.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,498,401 | 34.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 488,811 | 40.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 331,954 | 34.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 185,468 | 41.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 138,721 | 37.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 67,668 | 33.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 39,685 | 55.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.11% | 26,033 | 65.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.59% | 18,662 | 40.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.09% | 14,620 | 62.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 91,101 | 40.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 36,246 | 58.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 22,433 | 34.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 9,139 | 62.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.63% | 21,442 | 47.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.06% | 287 | 75.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.57% | 7,896 | 81.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,265 | 36.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.56% | 10,740 | 48.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 2,687 | 36.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 15,353 | 47.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.08% | 63,990 | 34.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.54% | 7,949 | 63.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.04% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.38% | 4,103 | 36.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.05% | 1,872 | 36.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 28,889 | 29.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.08% | 20,540 | 42.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 728 | 26.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.01% | 2,798 | 43.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,799 | 34.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 13,681 | 45.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 6,922 | 52.8% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 46.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.23% | 6,825 | 55.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.72% | 219 | 41.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 44,530 | 42.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 52.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,215 | 79.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.63% | 1,522 | 100.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.38% | 767 | 88.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.74% | 9,900 | 37.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 50.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.02% | 2,828 | 40.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.41% | 1,798 | 51.2% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 82.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 37.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 31.2% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.25% | 1,222 | 9.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 49.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 66.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 59.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 656 | 100.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 40.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.41% | 145 | 100.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 50.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 77.6% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 100.0% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.55% | 319 | 100.0% |