Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Female Unemployment
Choctaw Female Unemployment
5.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT | FEMALES
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in unemploymnet rate among females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of unemploymnet rate among females within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of unemploymnet rate among females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
| Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
| Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |
Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Female Unemployment Data |
| Minimum | 0.081% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 31.9% |
| Range | 80.3% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 18.2% | 7.2% |
| Median | 16.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Unemployment |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 255,473,271 | 5.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,228,114 | 5.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,910,324 | 5.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,611,390 | 5.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 543,137 | 5.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 395,988 | 5.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 202,562 | 5.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 147,680 | 4.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 92,803 | 5.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 38,840 | 6.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 38,279 | 5.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 21,697 | 4.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 21,368 | 5.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 92,210 | 4.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 38,929 | 4.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 15,329 | 6.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,447 | 6.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 25,377 | 5.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 3,484 | 13.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 9,107 | 4.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,265 | 5.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,302 | 5.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.93% | 3,615 | 10.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 15,862 | 3.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 64,463 | 6.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 10,044 | 8.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 3,116 | 16.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,378 | 8.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 5,571 | 18.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 28,806 | 5.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,315 | 6.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.33% | 685 | 1.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.00% | 3,118 | 3.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,799 | 4.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 12,745 | 7.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,361 | 7.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.79% | 9,159 | 2.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.27% | 7,953 | 3.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 44,978 | 4.1% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 5.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,562 | 8.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 5.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 6.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 6,114 | 7.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.56% | 461 | 3.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 2.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 4.2% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.88% | 356 | 8.3% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 5.1% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 7.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 7.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 11.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 7.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 7.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 5.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 7.7% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 7.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.93% | 119 | 9.5% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.55% | 381 | 31.9% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 6.9% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 3.2% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.50% | 40 | 23.1% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 11.8% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 5.6% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 17.0% |