Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
11.4%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 65
14.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,951,728 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 11.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 65.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Brazilian (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Israeli (11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Zaire (11.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Costa Rican (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants from Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants from Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
Costa Ricans | 17.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.3% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 16.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.3% |
Israelis | 16.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.3% |
Brazilians | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.3% |
Choctaw | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.4% |
Immigrants from Western Asia | 13.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.4% |
South American Indians | 11.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 11.3 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.4% |
Ugandans | 11.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.4% |
Indonesians | 10.4 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.5% |
Immigrants from China | 9.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 11.5% |
Nepalese | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 11.5% |
Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 39.1% |
Range | 75.0% | 36.6% |
Mean | 19.1% | 16.1% |
Median | 17.6% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.0% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 8.1% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 255,683,358 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,408,330 | 10.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,006,125 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,664,018 | 9.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 564,862 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 420,232 | 9.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 216,668 | 13.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 157,091 | 11.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 99,807 | 10.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 44,153 | 15.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 43,190 | 11.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 34,703 | 15.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 22,421 | 13.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,681 | 9.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 39,413 | 13.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 23,253 | 13.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,583 | 19.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,396 | 13.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 2,785 | 12.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 9,755 | 12.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,495 | 12.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 15.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.93% | 4,472 | 10.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,024 | 15.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 64,695 | 13.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 9,120 | 9.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 4,826 | 13.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,758 | 12.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,205 | 12.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 14.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,629 | 15.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 1,278 | 18.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 4,174 | 11.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 21.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,688 | 22.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 15.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 23.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,254 | 17.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 31.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,462 | 11.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 12.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 15.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 12.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 25.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 11,047 | 11.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 666 | 7.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 24.7% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 23.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 25.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 3.8% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 14.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 33.3% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 4.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 12.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 15.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 23.2% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 7.6% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 17.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 39.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 31.2% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.43% | 46 | 27.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 35.7% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 16.2% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 24 | 33.3% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 30.9% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 15.3% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 9.4% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 38.00% | 350 | 36.7% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 16.7% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 10.4% |
[ 50.5% - 51.0% ] 50.94% | 53 | 2.6% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 7.4% |