Choctaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
24.3%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,726,107 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 24.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.70% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (24.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Black/African American (24.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Alsatian (24.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Osage (24.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and Chickasaw (24.5%, a difference of 0.89%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 24.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 25.1% |
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.080% | 5.3% |
| Maximum | 98.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.1% | 94.7% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 32.0% |
| Median | 15.4% | 27.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.1% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 16.8% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 253,247,908 | 21.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,054,812 | 23.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,812,622 | 24.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,573,143 | 25.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 534,972 | 29.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 396,629 | 21.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 203,465 | 26.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 132,976 | 25.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 82,219 | 26.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 40,556 | 37.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 41,190 | 25.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 30,307 | 27.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 19,335 | 31.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 93,558 | 29.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 37,376 | 29.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 22,799 | 22.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 12,458 | 26.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.63% | 23,465 | 23.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 2,720 | 30.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 7,297 | 31.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,265 | 26.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 12,495 | 27.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 11.00% | 1,628 | 32.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 15,774 | 21.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 64,463 | 25.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.57% | 9,235 | 24.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,402 | 15.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,668 | 27.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,205 | 37.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,800 | 34.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,163 | 31.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 728 | 24.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.99% | 3,165 | 22.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,891 | 42.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,688 | 36.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,361 | 20.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.77% | 7,526 | 54.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.27% | 8,623 | 34.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,421 | 29.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 27.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,215 | 20.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 15.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 54.4% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.74% | 10,240 | 44.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 21.4% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 35.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.41% | 1,798 | 39.8% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.71% | 97 | 40.0% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 64.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 16.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 50.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 57.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 11.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.25% | 1,222 | 10.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 14.3% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 20.0% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 21.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 42.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 41.2% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.63% | 95 | 50.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 5.3% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 100.0% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 100.0% |