Choctaw vs Yuman Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Yuman
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Choctaw
Yuman
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Yuman Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,574,686 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 29.4%, a difference of 8.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Yuman |
| Minimum | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 87.4% | 87.3% |
| Mean | 41.2% | 43.1% |
| Median | 38.6% | 39.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.5% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.6% | 52.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 30.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 24.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Yuman by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 2.9%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |