Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Disability Age 35 to 64
Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64
16.4%
DISABILITY | AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,605,356 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 16.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), Chickasaw (16.1%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Creek (16.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |
Choctaw Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Disability Age 35 to 64 Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 50.0% |
Range | 98.1% | 47.8% |
Mean | 21.7% | 26.3% |
Median | 18.3% | 25.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 21.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 30.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.2% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.5% | 7.4% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 256,171,842 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,493,778 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 3,038,210 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,678,203 | 16.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 573,094 | 18.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 421,467 | 17.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 217,073 | 22.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 157,959 | 21.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 104,261 | 20.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 45,713 | 25.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 44,051 | 23.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 34,881 | 22.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 22,808 | 19.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 96,436 | 20.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.18% | 43,099 | 22.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 24,160 | 25.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 14,201 | 25.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,481 | 21.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 3,787 | 31.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 10,404 | 22.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,634 | 24.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,422 | 26.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.93% | 4,472 | 25.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 23.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,987 | 24.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 11,494 | 22.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 4,402 | 27.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,698 | 35.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 6,406 | 26.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 20.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 25,025 | 24.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 1,574 | 19.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 4,665 | 28.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 27.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,782 | 28.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 33.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 34.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 27.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.83% | 531 | 28.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,421 | 22.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 30.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 28.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 27.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 35.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 11,047 | 21.5% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.49% | 867 | 35.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 20.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 21.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 24.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,344 | 19.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 26.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 31.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 50.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 30.2% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 18.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 2,115 | 31.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.32% | 1,077 | 28.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 32.6% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 41.5% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 36.1% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.85% | 188 | 20.5% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 31.5% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.53% | 621 | 28.1% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 75 | 41.7% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 31.2% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.00% | 50 | 36.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 43.9% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.50% | 40 | 23.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 38.00% | 350 | 34.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 2.2% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.58% | 73 | 30.9% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 30.6% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 23.3% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 21.5% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 28.3% |