Choctaw Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Choctaw Single Mother Poverty
36.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,090,747 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 36.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.49% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Yakama (36.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Apache (36.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Native/Alaskan (36.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Choctaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.080% | 24.0% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.1% | 76.0% |
Mean | 20.0% | 53.6% |
Median | 16.9% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 42.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.6% | 58.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.7% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.5% | 17.0% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 253,414,414 | 30.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 6,096,835 | 34.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,880,799 | 35.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,582,988 | 34.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 541,752 | 41.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 396,172 | 37.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 212,263 | 46.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 153,966 | 41.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 98,341 | 53.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 39,875 | 54.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 38,567 | 52.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 33,084 | 50.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 20,084 | 58.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,080 | 34.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 38,982 | 42.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 23,069 | 39.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,583 | 44.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,410 | 46.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 2,686 | 33.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 9,171 | 60.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,404 | 55.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 50.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 3,461 | 57.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,242 | 49.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,364 | 50.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.59% | 10,442 | 52.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.84% | 3,116 | 24.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 4,910 | 44.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,205 | 68.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,855 | 32.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,629 | 32.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.34% | 1,323 | 49.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 4,061 | 31.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 53.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,478 | 47.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 48.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.79% | 9,159 | 55.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 50.2% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.89% | 270 | 68.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,234 | 53.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 54.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,562 | 53.7% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 57.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 59.3% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,919 | 71.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 666 | 30.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 70.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 68.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 60.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 100.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 44.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 83.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 50.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 42.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 42.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 64.3% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 51.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 54.4% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 93.3% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.51% | 526 | 64.0% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 24 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 71.4% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 53.3% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 50.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 50.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 100.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 51.8% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 57.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 100.0% |