Choctaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
18.1%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,245,536 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 18.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.17% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.47%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Ute (17.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 19.1% |
Choctaw Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.081% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 79.8% | 73.9% |
| Range | 79.7% | 70.3% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 28.4% |
| Median | 16.7% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.7% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.4% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 13.1% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 254,376,705 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 6,222,885 | 17.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,928,813 | 17.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,623,719 | 17.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 524,958 | 21.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 404,712 | 18.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 210,810 | 21.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 150,910 | 21.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 85,235 | 25.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 39,746 | 25.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 40,034 | 24.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 33,295 | 26.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 21,769 | 26.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,080 | 18.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 39,217 | 20.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 23,442 | 21.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 13,325 | 27.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 26,723 | 29.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 3,425 | 21.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 8,419 | 34.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,265 | 31.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 12,495 | 28.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 2,687 | 53.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 16,110 | 19.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,837 | 27.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.59% | 10,442 | 30.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.86% | 4,711 | 28.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 4,821 | 23.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.09% | 6,119 | 46.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,710 | 21.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 24,817 | 24.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.41% | 889 | 68.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 4,243 | 23.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 24.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,282 | 21.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 19.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 32.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 21.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.81% | 489 | 73.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,400 | 24.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 17.9% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,885 | 15.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 25.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.45% | 1,478 | 39.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,823 | 21.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.52% | 666 | 18.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 17.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 24.7% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.88% | 356 | 20.7% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 46.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 38.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 223 | 57.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 29.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,421 | 22.4% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 26.5% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 3.6% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 27.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 33.3% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 35.4% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.43% | 46 | 33.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 37.7% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 55.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 36.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 18.2% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 20.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 64.8% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 36.3% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 11.7% |