Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
21.3%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,402,535 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 21.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.52% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Grenada (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Kiowa (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Central America (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Haiti (21.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.5%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Choctaw Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.081% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.1% | 93.3% |
Mean | 21.2% | 33.8% |
Median | 17.6% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 18.2% |
Correlation Details
Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.081% | 254,458,144 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 6,265,074 | 20.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,943,199 | 19.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,609,077 | 18.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 552,942 | 22.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 388,769 | 19.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 213,234 | 25.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 154,434 | 22.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 101,940 | 20.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 39,026 | 35.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 40,399 | 23.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 31,690 | 30.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 21,769 | 23.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.70% | 95,080 | 19.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 38,312 | 23.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.60% | 23,442 | 28.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.09% | 12,621 | 32.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.61% | 25,445 | 30.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 3,525 | 29.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 9,171 | 22.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 28,404 | 30.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 20.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 4,233 | 31.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.40% | 15,862 | 23.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 65,837 | 27.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.58% | 11,430 | 30.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 4,826 | 25.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 4,829 | 22.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 6,406 | 49.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 29,710 | 18.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 23,916 | 23.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.41% | 863 | 66.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.96% | 3,984 | 11.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 35.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.89% | 14,282 | 34.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 7,872 | 29.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.78% | 9,509 | 33.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 9,031 | 33.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.89% | 270 | 71.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 45,400 | 39.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 21.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.36% | 7,215 | 31.3% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.65% | 3,002 | 28.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 57.2% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,919 | 32.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 11.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 25.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37% | 2,045 | 30.9% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.84% | 453 | 41.1% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 63.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 29.4% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.68% | 296 | 6.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 2,602 | 27.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.23% | 1,998 | 23.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 23.8% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 25.4% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 24.8% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.70% | 101 | 26.3% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.18% | 1,196 | 44.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.43% | 46 | 20.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.32% | 328 | 52.2% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.55% | 381 | 79.5% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 24 | 75.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 25.0% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 27.8% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 25.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.42% | 76 | 100.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 62.1% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 66.2% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.76% | 573 | 56.8% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 83.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.14% | 376 | 42.3% |