Choctaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Choctaw
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Choctaw Single Male Poverty
17.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,568,106 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512 and weighted average of 17.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.69% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Choctaw and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Choctaw influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Choctaw simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 0.72%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and Osage (16.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Choctaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 80.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 80.3% | 95.0% |
| Mean | 18.4% | 30.9% |
| Median | 16.0% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 34.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 20.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 20.1% |
Correlation Details
| Choctaw Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 238,564,076 | 12.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 5,197,788 | 17.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 2,627,944 | 15.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 1,365,505 | 16.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 459,167 | 19.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.59% | 311,799 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 181,673 | 23.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 137,064 | 16.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 75,097 | 16.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 36,610 | 21.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 38,423 | 27.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.65% | 23,127 | 32.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.17% | 14,657 | 25.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 93,137 | 16.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.19% | 36,026 | 15.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.59% | 20,962 | 23.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 11,169 | 22.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.63% | 21,442 | 33.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.18% | 2,092 | 22.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.44% | 4,005 | 18.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 26,922 | 27.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 13,048 | 17.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.94% | 2,687 | 18.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 11,580 | 15.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.09% | 63,743 | 31.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.56% | 7,215 | 23.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.88% | 3,425 | 13.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.41% | 5,527 | 33.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.04% | 2,707 | 32.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.38% | 28,889 | 22.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.06% | 23,394 | 25.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 728 | 50.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.99% | 3,433 | 21.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.55% | 17,945 | 30.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 13,681 | 20.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.36% | 7,640 | 14.9% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.79% | 9,159 | 32.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.27% | 7,953 | 27.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.45% | 44,911 | 21.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.93% | 3,869 | 15.8% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.37% | 6,892 | 20.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.69% | 435 | 44.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.44% | 1,208 | 50.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.75% | 10,823 | 29.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.45% | 245 | 16.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.95% | 4,021 | 35.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.41% | 1,798 | 55.6% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.88% | 356 | 14.3% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.32% | 2,315 | 100.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.01% | 3,327 | 27.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.86% | 1,940 | 21.4% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 1,799 | 19.1% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.76% | 1,974 | 50.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.36% | 871 | 5.0% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.15% | 1,187 | 23.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.20% | 1,076 | 36.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.21% | 447 | 54.0% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.63% | 95 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.75% | 141 | 75.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.58% | 579 | 53.8% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 156 | 50.0% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.00% | 150 | 25.0% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.40% | 1,240 | 100.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.03% | 4,298 | 50.0% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.35% | 514 | 44.4% |