Aleut vs Paiute Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Paiute
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Paiute
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Paiute Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,262,204 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 25.5%, a difference of 0.49%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Paiute |
Minimum | 7.7% | 10.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 89.9% |
Mean | 37.3% | 40.2% |
Median | 29.8% | 36.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 22.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.1% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 24.4% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Paiute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |