Aleut vs Apache Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
 Apache
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Apache
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Apache Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,845,911 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 27.7%, a difference of 9.0%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Apache | 
| Minimum | 7.7% | 16.4% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 92.3% | 83.6% | 
| Mean | 37.3% | 48.6% | 
| Median | 29.8% | 40.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 32.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.1% | 64.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.4% | 31.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 23.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.8% | 23.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Apache by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.91%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.9%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308  | Tragic 25.4%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309  | Tragic 25.4%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310  | Tragic 25.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311  | Tragic 25.5%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312  | Tragic 25.5%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313  | Tragic 25.6%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 25.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 25.8%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 26.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 26.3%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 26.4%  | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 26.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 26.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 26.8%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 26.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 27.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 27.4%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 27.5%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 27.7%  |