Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,771,523 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $46,213, a difference of 23.1%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $105,655, a difference of 21.2%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $55,954, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,353, a difference of 13.9%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.3%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).