Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,620,881 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.911. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 23.0 Immigrants from Chile.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $46,213, a difference of 28.4%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $88,388, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $103,412, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,440, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $55,954, a difference of 17.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Average
25.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 42.8%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Good
11.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.7%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.67%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Good
31.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
6.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.1%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.0%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.8%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.4%