Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Immigrants from Chile

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,373,825 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.658. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.187% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 187.4 Immigrants from Chile.
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,354, a difference of 5.6%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $105,655, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $103,412, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,954, a difference of 0.62%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $46,213, a difference of 0.89%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,353, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Average
25.7%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
11.5%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.77%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.95%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Good
31.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Poor
6.1%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%