Immigrants from Yemen vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,335,291 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Yemen communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Yemen within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Yemen corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,575 compared to $103,412, a difference of 38.7%), per capita income ($33,696 compared to $46,213, a difference of 37.1%), and median family income ($77,457 compared to $105,655, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,693 compared to $40,353, a difference of 16.3%), householder income under 25 years ($43,591 compared to $52,440, a difference of 20.3%), and median earnings ($39,540 compared to $47,697, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 142.1%), family poverty (17.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 96.4%), and receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.4%), single father poverty (20.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (16.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 110.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 84.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (8.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.3%), average family size (3.60 compared to 3.24, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple households (42.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.55%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (63.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 77.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 10.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (4.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.5%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (95.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (95.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (95.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Yemen and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.91% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 38.6%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.7%).