Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,655,370 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.188% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 188.0 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $55,954, a difference of 11.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $97,159, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($52,514 compared to $47,697, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $62,354, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.77%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and poverty (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.45%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.8%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.6%).