Immigrants from China vs Armenian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Armenian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Armenians
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Armenian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 0.98%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Armenian |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 60.0% |
| Range | 25.9% | 53.3% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 18.8% |
| Median | 15.7% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Armenians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Israel (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |