Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty
26.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,985,494 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 26.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from China influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Immigrants from China simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bolivia (26.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Pakistan (26.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (26.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Burmese (26.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Immigrants from Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 25.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 25.9% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants from Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 26.0% |
Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants from China | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 26.1% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants from Korea | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants from Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 26.2% |
Immigrants from Asia | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 26.3% |
Immigrants from Japan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 26.4% |
Immigrants from China Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.17% | 12.6% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 53.5% |
Range | 46.1% | 41.0% |
Mean | 15.7% | 24.9% |
Median | 13.9% | 23.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 8.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from China Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 215,572,741 | 32.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 90,583,777 | 28.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 37,086,942 | 26.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 23,909,076 | 28.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 13,174,142 | 25.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 9,776,993 | 24.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 4,662,446 | 24.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 5,533,350 | 23.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,857,665 | 25.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 2,885,731 | 22.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 2,710,852 | 23.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 11,727,854 | 31.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 1,530,009 | 22.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 1,019,543 | 24.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 2,221,641 | 20.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 669,610 | 20.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 1,039,504 | 20.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 978,820 | 21.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15% | 1,018,808 | 22.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 626,099 | 19.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.00% | 899,653 | 21.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 791,658 | 21.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 302,963 | 19.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.04% | 671,767 | 20.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 422,978 | 25.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 550,105 | 21.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 258,164 | 28.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 340,250 | 23.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 428,607 | 25.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 529,269 | 19.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.79% | 141,976 | 30.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35% | 1,056,987 | 23.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 363,548 | 23.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.07% | 265,821 | 32.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39% | 337,886 | 23.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 120,353 | 37.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.28% | 38,973 | 13.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 91,939 | 22.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.93% | 110,434 | 16.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.41% | 36,456 | 26.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.11% | 169,768 | 24.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.38% | 50,637 | 18.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.19% | 130,364 | 42.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02% | 111,247 | 16.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.42% | 280,512 | 21.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.96% | 79,645 | 28.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18% | 235,005 | 28.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44% | 45,650 | 17.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85% | 131,923 | 16.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.65% | 89,075 | 16.6% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 143,740 | 25.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.31% | 102,223 | 14.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 85,306 | 14.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.13% | 24,169 | 41.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.66% | 80,986 | 53.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 134,385 | 34.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 151,983 | 21.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 28,212 | 12.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.87% | 68,923 | 21.5% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63% | 36,165 | 25.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13% | 37,340 | 25.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66% | 52,268 | 17.7% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.73% | 87,947 | 21.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.51% | 25,460 | 30.5% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69% | 60,386 | 14.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.09% | 430 | 50.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.57% | 12,070 | 51.2% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36% | 25,001 | 13.8% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.69% | 26,418 | 19.7% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.16% | 53,371 | 26.4% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27% | 79,495 | 32.6% |