Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
13.6%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.18% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from China influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from China simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants from China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants from Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 42.3% |
Range | 46.1% | 41.4% |
Mean | 16.1% | 12.6% |
Median | 14.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 7.1% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from China Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 216,929,940 | 18.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 91,452,651 | 15.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 37,536,382 | 13.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 24,449,123 | 15.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 13,367,002 | 13.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 9,943,454 | 11.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 4,870,210 | 10.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 5,665,188 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 4,975,924 | 13.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 3,000,526 | 8.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 2,758,327 | 8.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 11,705,097 | 20.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 1,585,864 | 9.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 1,055,815 | 12.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 2,224,195 | 10.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.00% | 679,890 | 9.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 1,070,418 | 8.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 1,042,555 | 12.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15% | 991,680 | 8.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.62% | 660,198 | 8.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 8.00% | 931,636 | 6.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 825,864 | 6.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 302,963 | 9.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.04% | 665,243 | 7.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 422,978 | 12.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 582,775 | 11.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 238,658 | 9.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 344,468 | 10.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 435,582 | 7.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 531,320 | 10.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.81% | 158,831 | 12.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35% | 1,056,987 | 7.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 383,600 | 9.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.07% | 268,571 | 18.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 352,111 | 8.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 120,353 | 35.7% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.27% | 47,202 | 9.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 96,124 | 13.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.93% | 110,434 | 4.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 40,627 | 4.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 744 | 5.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.11% | 183,427 | 9.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.38% | 50,637 | 6.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.19% | 148,790 | 20.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02% | 111,247 | 11.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40% | 312,200 | 9.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92% | 110,416 | 6.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18% | 235,005 | 15.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44% | 45,650 | 9.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85% | 131,923 | 11.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.95% | 482 | 20.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.65% | 89,075 | 8.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 143,740 | 6.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.31% | 102,223 | 10.8% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 85,306 | 11.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.13% | 24,169 | 20.6% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.82% | 1,100 | 7.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.65% | 76,518 | 42.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 134,385 | 23.4% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 151,983 | 11.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 28,212 | 9.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.87% | 68,923 | 9.2% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63% | 36,165 | 9.9% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13% | 37,340 | 12.1% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66% | 52,268 | 10.9% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.73% | 87,947 | 10.9% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.51% | 25,460 | 15.3% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69% | 60,386 | 10.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.09% | 430 | 17.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.51% | 1,107 | 13.3% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.57% | 12,070 | 36.4% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36% | 25,001 | 0.83% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.69% | 26,418 | 14.9% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.16% | 53,371 | 27.5% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27% | 79,495 | 26.1% |