Immigrants from China vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Burmese
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 0.75%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Burmese |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 43.2% |
| Range | 25.9% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 16.0% |
| Median | 15.7% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |