Immigrants from China Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Immigrants from China Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
13.2%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,867,454 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 13.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.26% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from China and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from China influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Immigrants from China simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Subsaharan African (13.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Somali (13.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Israeli (13.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
Immigrants from Nigeria | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chippewa | 2.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Morocco | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.1% |
Shoshone | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cree | 2.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
Israelis | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Somalis | 1.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants from China | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants from Chile | 1.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 1.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants from Israel | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants from China Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
Minimum | 0.17% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 46.3% | 37.1% |
Range | 46.1% | 34.2% |
Mean | 15.9% | 14.7% |
Median | 14.3% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.5% | 16.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.5% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from China Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 217,473,979 | 11.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54% | 92,201,481 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 37,965,800 | 10.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 24,855,148 | 12.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 13,638,189 | 11.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 10,148,723 | 10.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52% | 4,969,579 | 10.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91% | 5,760,504 | 9.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29% | 5,065,466 | 13.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 3,057,150 | 10.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 2,750,016 | 10.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 11,805,357 | 18.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 1,636,651 | 9.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 1,092,669 | 13.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 2,245,478 | 13.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.01% | 686,787 | 10.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40% | 1,079,585 | 12.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 1,014,265 | 16.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15% | 1,027,452 | 13.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.62% | 690,994 | 11.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.99% | 944,208 | 12.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40% | 852,327 | 10.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.77% | 339,162 | 10.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.04% | 675,589 | 12.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56% | 422,571 | 12.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 583,996 | 13.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 260,952 | 14.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 348,046 | 12.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99% | 417,349 | 12.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41% | 531,320 | 13.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.80% | 158,427 | 12.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35% | 1,056,987 | 17.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 377,754 | 16.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.07% | 268,571 | 16.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39% | 351,240 | 13.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 120,497 | 29.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 24,692 | 17.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 83,037 | 16.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.93% | 110,434 | 17.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 39,860 | 7.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.11% | 183,427 | 7.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.38% | 50,637 | 16.5% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.18% | 134,419 | 16.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02% | 110,950 | 13.9% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40% | 312,200 | 13.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92% | 110,416 | 6.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18% | 235,005 | 17.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44% | 45,650 | 7.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85% | 131,923 | 12.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.98% | 13,722 | 23.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.65% | 89,435 | 9.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 143,740 | 12.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.31% | 102,223 | 18.3% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 85,306 | 16.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.13% | 24,169 | 11.6% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.82% | 1,100 | 2.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.66% | 80,986 | 31.7% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74% | 134,385 | 23.9% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 151,983 | 13.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 28,212 | 9.1% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.87% | 68,923 | 10.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63% | 36,165 | 8.8% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13% | 37,340 | 18.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66% | 52,268 | 19.8% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.73% | 87,947 | 13.1% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.51% | 25,460 | 31.0% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69% | 60,386 | 15.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.09% | 430 | 37.1% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.57% | 12,070 | 27.4% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36% | 25,001 | 5.7% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.69% | 26,418 | 11.5% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.16% | 53,371 | 23.4% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27% | 79,495 | 33.1% |