Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Hong Kong
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,865,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of 16.5%, a difference of 9.8%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
Minimum | 7.4% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 30.8% |
Range | 25.9% | 27.8% |
Mean | 16.3% | 14.5% |
Median | 15.7% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Iranian (18.0%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 1.7%), Chinese (16.1%, a difference of 2.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |