Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Immigrants from Israel
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Immigrants from Israel Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,619,232 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 28.6% |
| Range | 25.9% | 25.2% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 16.3% |
| Median | 15.7% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Immigrants from Israel by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (18.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |