Immigrants from China vs Celtic Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 25.3%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China	Celtic
Minimum	7.4%	11.1%
Maximum	33.3%	100.0%
Range	25.9%	88.9%
Mean	16.3%	33.1%
Median	15.7%	27.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.6%	22.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.6%	39.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	17.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.6%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.5%	16.7%

Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 18.3%
Maltese	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 18.3%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 18.3%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 18.3%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 18.3%

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.9 /100 \| #253	Tragic 22.5%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.8 /100 \| #254	Tragic 22.6%
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.8 /100 \| #255	Tragic 22.6%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.8 /100 \| #256	Tragic 22.6%
Sudanese	0.7 /100 \| #257	Tragic 22.6%
Bahamians	0.6 /100 \| #258	Tragic 22.7%
Whites/Caucasians	0.6 /100 \| #259	Tragic 22.7%
Celtics	0.5 /100 \| #260	Tragic 22.7%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	0.4 /100 \| #261	Tragic 22.8%
British West Indians	0.4 /100 \| #262	Tragic 22.8%
Scotch-Irish	0.3 /100 \| #263	Tragic 22.9%
Immigrants \| Laos	0.3 /100 \| #264	Tragic 22.9%
Central Americans	0.2 /100 \| #265	Tragic 23.0%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.2 /100 \| #266	Tragic 23.0%
Senegalese	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 23.0%