Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from China within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.12% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from China influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from China simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants from Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants from Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants from China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from China Data	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data
Minimum	0.17%	1.1%
Maximum	46.3%	24.4%
Range	46.1%	23.3%
Mean	15.7%	12.0%
Median	14.3%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.8%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.7%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.9%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.8%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.7%	4.7%

Correlation Details

Immigrants from China Percentile	Sample Size	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17%	216,709,753	19.1%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.54%	90,914,592	15.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95%	37,394,230	13.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33%	24,612,350	15.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73%	13,336,490	14.0%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10%	9,891,754	11.7%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.52%	4,779,172	10.1%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.91%	5,648,524	10.8%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.29%	4,909,289	12.6%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66%	3,024,334	8.0%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01%	2,743,298	9.5%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58%	11,787,239	20.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83%	1,593,262	9.4%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24%	1,027,285	11.4%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64%	2,202,826	10.1%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.00%	678,835	8.8%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.40%	1,044,197	8.4%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77%	1,004,744	11.5%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.15%	1,012,933	8.6%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.62%	662,502	8.3%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 8.00%	949,526	6.9%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.40%	831,217	7.0%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76%	286,661	9.0%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.04%	671,767	6.9%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.56%	422,978	12.6%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87%	571,929	12.3%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25%	246,975	11.6%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70%	345,687	11.0%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.99%	428,607	7.8%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.41%	531,320	8.8%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.81%	162,814	8.1%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.35%	1,056,987	9.5%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68%	354,036	8.2%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.07%	268,571	16.8%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39%	337,886	8.1%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.27%	47,202	8.0%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63%	96,124	11.2%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.93%	110,434	5.7%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39%	40,627	11.8%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59%	744	24.4%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.11%	183,427	9.6%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.38%	50,637	8.2%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.19%	148,790	17.0%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.02%	111,247	13.0%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40%	312,200	9.2%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92%	113,241	5.5%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.18%	235,005	18.1%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.44%	45,650	1.1%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85%	131,923	12.7%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.95%	482	12.0%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.65%	89,075	9.3%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87%	143,740	7.8%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.31%	102,223	11.2%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68%	85,306	11.0%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.13%	24,169	19.3%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.74%	134,385	22.2%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09%	151,983	13.9%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46%	28,212	8.9%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.87%	68,923	13.9%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.63%	36,165	18.5%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13%	37,340	16.8%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.66%	52,268	15.2%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.73%	87,947	16.7%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.51%	25,460	11.7%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.69%	60,386	12.7%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.09%	430	13.9%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.57%	12,070	20.9%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36%	25,001	2.5%
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.69%	26,418	11.8%
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.16%	53,371	23.0%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27%	79,495	21.4%

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

COMPARE

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16Exceptional

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Exceptional